USPTO serial 73810236
SPINNER'S TEAM OF TRADESMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPINNER'S TEAM OF TRADESMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CROWS NEST, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
SPINNER'S SYSTEM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Other trademarks owned by SPINNER'S SYSTEM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE B. NEWITT
GEORGE B NEWITT ALLEGRETTI & WITCOFF, LTD10 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | FRANCHISING SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TECHNICAL AID AND ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERTION OF SERVICE COMPANIES IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICES, NAMELY, CARPETRY, PAINTING, ROOFING, PLASTERING, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELIC METROPOL PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SPINNER'S SYSTEM (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SPINNER'S TEAM OF TRADESMEN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |