Drawing for THERMOSURGERY

USPTO serial 73810728

THERMOSURGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMOSURGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES R. HOFFMAN

CHARLES R HOFFMAN CAHILL, SUTTON & THOMAS1400 VALLEY BANK CTRPHOENIX, AZ 85073UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY ELECTRICAL APPARATUS FOR DELIVERING CONTROLLED LOCALIZED HEAT TO PERFORM A NON INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDUREABANDONEDApr 4, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 1993PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 22, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Apr 29, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance