USPTO serial 73810728
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R. HOFFMAN
CHARLES R HOFFMAN CAHILL, SUTTON & THOMAS1400 VALLEY BANK CTRPHOENIX, AZ 85073UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY ELECTRICAL APPARATUS FOR DELIVERING CONTROLLED LOCALIZED HEAT TO PERFORM A NON INVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURE | ABANDONED | Apr 4, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 29, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |