USPTO serial 73811464
ROYAL COPENHAGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL COPENHAGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2000 FREDERIKSBERG, DK
2000 FREDERIKSBERG, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, HOLMAN& STERN400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM; CONES WITH ICE CREAM; BISCUITS; WAFERS; CAKES; PASTRIES; CHOCOLATE CANDY; LICORICE CANDY; CHEWING GUM; AND LOZENGES, ALL BEING NON-MEDICATED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |