USPTO serial 73812222
NUTRIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRECKSVILLE, OH
BRECKSVILLE, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD C. MISKIN
HOWARD C. MISKIN Miskin & Tsui-Yip, LLP1350 BroadwaySuite 802New York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN AND/OR MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND VITAMIN AND/OR MINERAL CONCENTRATES FOR DISPERSING IN PET, LIVESTOCK, FISH AND POULTRY FEEDS; MEDICAMENT SUPPLEMENTS FOR DISPERSING IN PET, LIVESTOCK, FISH AND POULTRY FEEDS; FEED INGREDIENTS FOR LIVESTOCK, PET AND POULTRY FEEDS; VITAMINS, ELECTROLYTES, DIETARY AND MEDICINAL ADDITIVES TO LIVESTOCK, FISH, POULTRY AND PET FEED; DRY AND LIQUID CHOLINE CHLORIDE FOR LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY | ABANDONED | Sep 18, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |