USPTO serial 73812457
HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EAST PROVIDENCE, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW S. MCCONNELL
ANDREW S MCCONNELL ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 12, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |