Drawing for Serial No. 73812976

USPTO serial 73812976

Serial No. 73812976

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73812976?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. MOHR

MICHAEL A MOHR AMWAY CORPORATION7575 E FULTON RDADA, MI 49355UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL CLEANING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY-LAUNDRY SOAP; FABRIC SOFTENER AND BRIGHTENER; LAUNDRY DETERGENT BOOSTER CONTAINING PHOSPHAT; DISHWASHING SOAP; CAR WASHING SOAP; ALL PURPOSE CLEANING CONCENTRATE; MULTI-PURPOSE CLEANER AND FLOOR SEALER; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY-HAIR SHAMPOOABANDONEDSep 30, 1976
005DOMESTIC AND COMMERCIAL SANITIZING AND DISINFECTING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY-PREPARATIONS FOR GERMICIDAL, FUNGICIDAL, VIRUCIDAL, BACTERICIDAL CLEANINGABANDONEDJan 31, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 13, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 1, 1992CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance