USPTO serial 73813084
UNILUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 1992
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNILUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6393 WEHRHEIM/TS, DE
6393 WEHRHEIM/TS, DE
HANAU, GRUNER WEG 11, DE
6393 WEHRHEIM/TS, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATHANIEL D KRAMER
NATHANIEL D KRAMER SPRUNG KRAMER SCHAEFER & BRISCOE120 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | RADIATION AND POLYMERIZATION APPARATUS FOR CURING PLASTICS FOR USE BY DENTISTS AND DENTAL TECHNICIANS, HISTOLOGISTS AND COSMETICIANS; AND PARTS AND TIMING SWITCH EQUIPMENT THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | RADIATION AND POLYMERIZATION APPARATUS FOR CURING PLASTICS FOR METALLURGICAL PURPOSES, AND PARTS OF SUCH EQUIPMENT; TIMING SWITCH EQUIPMENT THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KULZER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KULZER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by HERAEUS KULZER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KULZER GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named UNILUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2003 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 1998 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 20, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |