USPTO serial 73813109
EXPLORERS CLUB CNB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPLORERS CLUB CNB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HUGO C. BURDT
HUGO C BURDT LYNCH, DALLAS, SMITH & HARMAN526 SECOND AVE S EP O BOX 2457CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406-2457Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SOCIAL CLUB SERVICES | ABANDONED | Aug 11, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |