Drawing for SAS

USPTO serial 73813621

SAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J. MEYERS

STEPHEN J MEYERS SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PCSTE 1800TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MANAGEMENT OF SPACE FLIGHT FOR OTHERS AND MANAGEMENT OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROJECTS AND TECHNICAL PROJECTS FOR OTHERSABANDONED—
042SYSTEM DESIGN OF SPACECRAFT AND CONTROL CENTERS THEREFOR; DESIGN OF INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE AUTOMATION SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; "MAN-MACHINE" INTERFACES AND ENGINEERING; HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH SERVICES; CONDUCTING QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES FOR OTHERS; AND RENDERING OF TECHNICAL SERVICES IN THE FORM OF SPECIALIZED MANPOWER AND SPECIFIC METHODS AND TOOLS TO DESIGN, IMPLEMENT, TEST, VALIDATE, QUALIFY AND OPERATE INSTRUMENTS ON BOARD AIRCRAFT AND SPACECRAFT AND TO PROVIDE MANPOWER, METHODS AND TOOLS TO THE CONDUCT OF SCIENTIFIC OR COMMERCIAL RESEARCH INVOLVING EXPERIMENTS THAT MAKE USE OF SUCH INSTRUMENTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 1993OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 23, 1993OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 16, 1992OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 6, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 4, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 15, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 4, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance