USPTO serial 73814137
SUPERBAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1640071Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 1991
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERBAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIK M. ARNHEM
ERIK M ARNHEM4250 WILSHIRE BLVDSECOND FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SHOPPING BAGS MADE OF SOFT PLASTIC MATERIAL | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 22, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1992 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |