USPTO serial 73814812
STAR PUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAR PUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BOWMANVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES L. GAGNEBIN III
CHARLES L GAGNEBIN III WEINGARTEN, SCHURGIN, GAGNEBIN & HAYESTEN POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |