USPTO serial 73814905
NITROTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 1996
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NITROTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
SOLIHULL, WEST MIDLANDS B91 3TX, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
SOLIHULL, WEST MIDLANDS B91 3TX, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BIRMINGHAM, B19 2XF, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD E. SHAPIRO
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | HEAT TREATMENT AND COATING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAUCK HEAT TREATMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by TTI GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SENIOR HEAT TREATMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named NITROTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 20, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 1997 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |