USPTO serial 73815051
ALLEGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLEGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OSBORNE PARK, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST A. BEUTLER
ERNEST A BEUTLER C/O HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCEP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | CLOCKS, WATCHES AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR INCLUDING WATCH BANDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 1991 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |