USPTO serial 73815058
JUST DO IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUST DO IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDMONTON, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY S. KAPLAN
HENRY S KAPLAN DRESSLER, GOLDSMITH, SHORE, ET AL2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 504ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |