CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CONTINUOUS AIRFLOW SYSTEM

USPTO serial 73815531

CONTINUOUS AIRFLOW SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CONTINUOUS AIRFLOW SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVE M. MCLARY

STEVE M MCLARY HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES, INCHWY 46BATESVILLE, IN 47006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING A PORTABLE AIR MATTRESS OVERLAY SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONAL SUPPORT DESPTIE MOVEMENT RELATED PRESSURE CHANGES FOR THE PREVENTION, TREATMENT AND EARLY MANAGEMENT OF PRESSURE SORESABANDONEDJun 6, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance