USPTO serial 73816759
NITROTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 27, 1996
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NITROTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BIRMINGHAM, B19 2XF, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BIRMINGHAM, B19 2XF, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
BIRMINGHAM, B19 2XF, GB
Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD E. SHAPIRO
RONALD E SHAPIRO VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE1828 L ST NW 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | FURNACES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF METALS AND METAL ARTICLES; COOLING BATHS AND VATS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SENIOR HEAT TREATMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TTI GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named NITROTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |