USPTO serial 73817287
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY R. COSCIA
ANTHONY R COSCIA WINDELS, MARX, DAVIES & IVES156 W 56TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | ABANDONED | Jun 20, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |