USPTO serial 73820050
FLORA DANICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 1999
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FLORA DANICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2000 FREDERIKSBERG, DK
2000 FREDERIKSBERG, DK
GLOSTRUP, DK
2600 GLOSTRUP, DK
2000 FREDERIKSBERG, DK
FREDERIKSBERG, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
Karin Segall Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Avenue, Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [PORCELAIN HANDLES FOR KNIFES, FORKS AND SPOONS] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | PORCELAIN, NAMELY, DINNER SALAD/DESERT-BREAD/BUTTER PLATES, CUPS, AND SAUCERS, SOUP BOWLS, PLATTERS, OPEN AND COVERED DISHES, SAUCEBOATS AND STANDS, TRAYS, TUREENS, COFFEE/TEA POTS, SUGAR AND CREAMERS, EGG CUPS, BON-BON DISHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL COPENHAGEN A/S
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL SCANDINAVIA A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FISKARS DENMARK A/S
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL COPENHAGEN A/S
- Other trademarks owned by ROYAL COPENHAGEN A/S
- Other trademarks owned by FISKARS DENMARK (VITA) A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named FLORA DANICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 15, 2019 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| May 18, 1998 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 1995 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 4, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |