Drawing for MATILDA BAY

USPTO serial 73820078

MATILDA BAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
O LEAR, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATILDA BAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEREMIAH D. MCAULIFFE

JEREMIAH D MCAULIFFE PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY, ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS, FRUITDRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; AND SYRUPS FOR MAKING BEVERAGESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 27, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance