USPTO serial 73820216
TAP-CODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAP-CODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HARLOW, ESSEX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY M. HOWISON
GREGORY M HOWISON ROSS HOWISON CLAPP & KORN900 PARK PACIFIC ONE740 E CAMPBELL RDRICHARDSON, TX 75081Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | LABELLING MACHINES; PRINTING MACHINES FOR PRINTING ON LABELS, PACKAGING AND PRODUCT SUBSTRATES; INK JET PRINTERS; THERMAL PRINTERS; MACHINES FOR PRINTING BAR CODE LABELS AND APPLYING PRINTED BAR CODE LABELS TO CASSETTES AND CARTRIDGES; MACHINES FOR PACKAGING TAPE CASSETTES AND CARTRIDGES; MACHINES FOR BOXING AND CARTONING OF PACKAGED CASSETTES AND CARTRIDGES; MACHINES FOR LOADING MAGNETIC TAPE AND PRINT RIBBON INTO CASSETTES AND CARTRIDGES; MAGNETIC TAPE AND PRINT RIBBON SPLICERS; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |