Drawing for Serial No. 73820494

USPTO serial 73820494

Serial No. 73820494

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KULICK, LIZBETH B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73820494?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD L. BROWN, JR.

EDWARD L BROWN JR110 N MARKETSTE 420WICHITA, KS 67202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF AIRCRAFTABANDONEDOct 13, 1964

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 15, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 19, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance