USPTO serial 73820695
ELEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. HOICKA
L HOICKA RIDOUT & MAYBEESTE 2300101 RICHMOND ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 2J7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | MODULAR WALL SYSTEMS, NAMELY WALL PANELS, NON-METALLIC DOORS, NON-METALLIC DOOR FRAMES AND ACCESSORY MOUNTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |