USPTO serial 73821196
EXPLORER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPLORER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. STEPHEN SAMUELS
I STEPHEN SAMUELS SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NAVIGATIONAL INSTRUMENTS; NAMELY, MAGNETIC COMPASSES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |