USPTO serial 73821431
IMSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONDON, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M. LEE, JR.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS & SWEENEY105 W ADAMSSTE 300CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR USE WITH COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AIDED DISIGN; PRINTED FLOWCHARTS AND PRINTED LISTINGS OF CODES, TEACHING AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS AND HANDBOOKS, AND NEWSLETTERS, ALL FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |