USPTO serial 73821797
SGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 1993
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MUNROE FALLS, OH
MUNROE FALLS, OH
KYOCERA SGS PRECISION TOOLS, INC.
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
MUNROE FALLS, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Watkins
Mark A. Watkins Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255Columbus, OH 43216-2255UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER OPERATED SOLID CARBIDE TOOLS;, namely, BURS, MILLS, DRILLS, JIG BORERS, ROUTERS, COUNTERSINKS, [ SAWS, ] REAMERS, [ TURBINE GRINDERS ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SGS TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SGS TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by KYOCERA SGS PRECISION TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SGS TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 16, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 1998 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |