USPTO serial 73821878
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARTH X. DEROSA
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; CASH REGISTERS, CALCULATING MACHINES, CALCULATORS, COMPUTERS AND OTHER DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AS WELL ACCESSORY EQUIPMENTS THEREOF, DISPLAY SCREENS, KEYBOARDS, PRINTERS, VIDEO MATERIALS, CARRIERS OF ANY KIND, IN PARTICULAR MAGNETIC; CONTROL MATERIAL OF ELECTRONIC MACHINES AS WELL AS ACCESSORY EQUIPMENTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 042 | FACILITIES FOR TRANSMITTING INFORMATIONS THROUGH CABLES OR BY RADIO, TELEMATICS, TELECOPIERS, TELEXES AND THE LIKE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER MEMORIES, COMPUTER CONSULTANTS, COMPUTER SERVICES, SOFTWARE CONCEPTION; ENGINEER'S STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROCESSING; RENTING OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |