USPTO serial 73822435
BO BALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BO BALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KANSAS CITY, MO
KANSAS CITY, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | OBLONG SHAPED BALL MADE OF WHITE LEATHER WITH READ STITCHING AT THE SEAMS | ACTIVE | Jul 12, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |