USPTO serial 73825153
VIDEOCRYPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEOCRYPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT J. STEVENS
SCOTT J STEVENS THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC600 N SHERMAN DRINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR THE GENERATION, EMISSION, TRANSMISSION, DETECTION, AMPLIFICATION, MODULATION, RECORDING AND REPRODUCTION OF SOUNDS AND IMAGES FOR RADIO AND TELEVISION; TELEVISION AND RADIO RECEIVERS; ENCRYPTION APPARATUS FOR AUDIO AND VIDEO SIGNALS; TELEVISION CAMERAS; MAGNETOSCOPES AND TELEVISION SIGNAL RECORDERS; BLANK AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE AND DISKS; AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; CATHODIC TUBES; DEFLECTING COILS; FOCUSING CIRCUITS; PRE-RECORDED DISKS AND MAGNETIC TAPES FEATURING MUSIC; RADIO-ELECTRICAL ANTENNAE; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |