USPTO serial 73825817
DOUBLE FRUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOUBLE FRUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT V. VICKERS
ROBERT V VICKERS BODY, VICKERS & DANIELS2000 TERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRUIT COMPOTE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |