USPTO serial 73825996
TRADE WINDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRADE WINDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY JO KISHEL
MARY JO KISHEL STRADLEY, RONON, STEVENS & YOUNG2600 ONE COMMERCE SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | ADVISORY NEWSLETTERS RELATING TO MUTUAL FUNDS, BROKERAGE SERVICES, RETIREMENT PLANNING, AND OTHER INVESTMENT TOPICS, DIRECTED PRIMARILY TO CUSTOMERS AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1991 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |