USPTO serial 73826389
PLASTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLASTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS T. STEADMAN, JR.
LEWIS T STEADMAN JR HILL, VAN SANTEN, STEADMAN & SIMPSON, PC70TH FL SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | SLIDE FASTENERS, TOUCH AND CLOSE FASTENERS, ADJUSTABLE FASTENERS, BUCKLES, BUTTONS, SNAP BUTTONS, STUD BUTTONS, HOOK AND EYE FASTENERS, EYELETS, STRAP HOLDERS, SNAP HOOKS, CLASP FASTENERS AND SUSPENDER HOLDERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 4, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |