USPTO serial 73826788
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. PAUL BURD
L PAUL BURD BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 56304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FRESH BAKED BAKERY GOODS | ABANDONED | Jan 3, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |