Drawing for RHAPSODY FARMS

USPTO serial 73826901

RHAPSODY FARMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHAPSODY FARMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW O. PACHER

MATTHEW O PACHER DAMRELL, DAMRELL & NELSON, PC1625 I STMODESTO, CA 95354UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FROZEN YOGURTABANDONEDJul 17, 1989
035ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODSABANDONEDJul 17, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 1990NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jul 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance