USPTO serial 73827082
BOLCHOJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 1993
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOLCHOJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-8001 ZURICH, CH
CH-8001 ZURICH, CH
CH-8001 ZURICH, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACOB SCHILD
JACOB SCHILD C/O DR MAX FOGIEL61 ETHEL RD WPISCATAWAY, NJ 08854-5963UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [ SHOES; NAMELY, WALKING SHOES, RUNNING SHOES AND SNEAKERS, SANDALS, BOOTS, DRESS SHOES, MOCCASINS, SPORTS SHOES AND SNEAKERS; CLOTHES; NAMELY, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, DRESSES, JACKETS AND SUITS, TROUSERS, HATS, SHIRTS, SWEATERS, TIES, SCARVES, STOCKINGS AND SOCKS, COATS, RAINWEAR, GLOVES, SWIMWEAR, UNIFORMS, UNDERGARMENTS ] * T-SHIRTS * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 29, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |