USPTO serial 73827553
SOLUFEED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLUFEED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRAND ZAID
FRAND ZAID OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURTP O BOX 50FIRST CANADIAN PLTORONTO, ON M5X 1B8Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | LAWN, GARDEN AND TREE CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY LAWN FERTILIZER, GARDEN FERTILIZER, TREE FERTILIZER, LAWN HERBICIDE, GARDEN HERBICIDE, TREE HERBICIDE, LAWN PESTICIDE, GARDEN PESTICIDE AND TREE PESTICIDE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | SERVICES OF APPLYING LAWN FERTILIZER, GARDEN FERTILIZER, TREE FERTILIZER LAWN, HERBICIDE, GARDEN HERBICIDE, TREE HERBICIDE, LAWN PESTICIDE, GARDEN PESTICIDE AND TREE PESTICIDE, AND THE SERVICES OF AERATING, ROLLING AND DE-THATCHING LAWNS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |