USPTO serial 73828267
PIXIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIXIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. BROWNE
RICHARD C BROWNE WINSTON & STRAWN1400 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3502UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM | ABANDONED | Jul 10, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |