USPTO serial 73828270
HOME CONDITION ANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 1992
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOME CONDITION ANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DALE M. HERMANN
DALE M HERMANN FOUNTAIN RHOADES PC1100 COMMONWEALTH BLDG421 S W SIXTH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HOME INSPECTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMER ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMER TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HOME CONDITION ANALYSIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |