Drawing for LENTHERIC STYLE

USPTO serial 73828382

LENTHERIC STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LENTHERIC STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. JOHN CAMPAIGN

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PERSONAL SOAPS AND TOILET SOAPS; PERFUMERY PRODUCTS - NAMELY, PARFUM DE TOILETTE, PARFUM DE TOILETTE SPRAY, CONCENTRATED PERFUME, CONCENTRATED PERFUME SPRAY, PERFUMED TALC, PERFUMED BODY SILK (BODY LOTION), PERFUMED DUSTING POWDER, PERFUMED COLOGNE; BODY CREAMS, BODY POWDERS, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS; BUBBLE BATH AND BATH OILABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 1991ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance