USPTO serial 73828519
Serial No. 73828519
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73828519?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. YOUNG
JAMES L YOUNG KINNEY & LANGE, PASTE 1500 625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; FISH; POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES; JAMS; EGGS; MILK; MILK PRODUCTS; NAMELY, ICED RED BEAN AND SOYA BEAN MILK; EDIBLE FATS; SALAD DRESSINGS; FRUIT PRESERVES; AND SALAD MADE THEREFROM | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | ICE CREAM AND MILK SHAKES | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | CREAM SODA AND SOFT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FAIRWOOD TRADEMARK B.V.I. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FAIRWOOD FAST FOOD LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |