USPTO serial 73828748
CENTURY VILLAGE OF PHILADELPHIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDONALD, MARY KAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CENTURY VILLAGE OF PHILADELPHIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PHILADELPHIA, PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR H. SEIDEL
ARTHUR H SEIDEL SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PC1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM LEASING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ABANDONED | Apr 13, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |