USPTO serial 73828903
WITCH-WIPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WITCH-WIPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTH CROYDON, SURREY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Reichertz
PETER S REICHERTZ ARENT, FOX, KINTNER, PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CLEANING PREPARATIONS, TOILETRIES AND COSMETICS--NAMELY SOAPS, MEDICATED SOAPS, TOILET PREPARATIONS IN THE FORM OF MILKS, CREAMS, LOTIONS, GELS AND OILS, ALL FOR APPLICATION TO THE SKIN BY WIPING; WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH SUCH PREPARATIONS; AND PERSONAL DEODERANTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL, MEDICATED AND SANITARY PREPARATIONS FOR APPLICATION TO THE SKIN FOR TREATMENT OF BRUISES, CUTS, BITES, STINGS, OILY PATCHES, ENLARGED PORES, ACNE, SKIN IRRITATIONS, ECZEMA AND HEMORRHOIDS, ALL FOR APPLICATION BY WIPING; WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH PREPARATIONS; ANTISEPTIC PREPARATIONS; ALL-PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS; ANTISEPTIC WIPES; AND ALL PURPOSE DISINFECTANT WIPES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |