USPTO serial 73829538
DELTAPINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DELTAPINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. ELLIOTT, JR.
WILLIAM H ELLIOTT JR SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER2600 ONE READING CTR1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | AGRICULTURAL PLANTING SEED | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |