USPTO serial 73830213
RULES OF THE GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RULES OF THE GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY HUTCHINGS REED
MARY HUTCHINGS REED WINSTON & STRAWN35 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY SHORT TELEVISION SEGMENTS DISCUSSING RULES OF SPORTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |