USPTO serial 73830411
KOBELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOBELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LIDCOMBE, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B. MURRAY
ROBERT B MURRAY ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, ET ALSTE 1000, 1725 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SOLD IN THE FORM OF SHEETS, STRIPS, BARS AND RODS AND METAL ALLOYS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | MEASURING APPARATUS AND METAL SHEATHED CABLES CONTAINING AT LEAST ONE CONDUCTOR WIRE AND DEVICES MADE FROM SUCH CABLES, NAMELY RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS AND PARTS THEREFOR, THERMOCOUPLES AND SIGNAL CABLES AND TRANSDUCERS, IGNITION PROBES (IGNITORS) AND FLAME DETECTORS, AND HIGH TEMPERATURE LEAD-THROUGH DEVICES, NAMELY CABLES, CONDUCTORS AND CONNECTORS | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | ELECTRIC HEATING ELEMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |