USPTO serial 73830592
HOUSEMASTER HOME IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOUSEMASTER HOME IMPROVEMENT SPECIALISTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. CARNAHAN
WILLIAM H CARNAHAN345 BUCKEYE DRCOLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80919UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | residential construction services, namely planning and custom construction of home improvements | ABANDONED | Oct 16, 1972 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |