USPTO serial 73830867
AG ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHO, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AG ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH MUSKEGON, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. COOPER
RICHARD C COOPER PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTONP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | THE SERVICES OF PROVIDING TO FARMING CUSTOMERS PERSONAL PURCHASE RECORDS, HOME DELIVERY, MAILED INFORMATION, PREFERRED TREATMENT ON RETURNS AND BULK PRICE DISCOUNTS, CHECK CASHING, ET AL | ABANDONED | Mar 12, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1991 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |