USPTO serial 73830963
TRU-CUT TOOL & MACHINE CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRU-CUT TOOL & MACHINE CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BURPEE
CHARLES E BURPEE WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD900 OLD KENT BLDG 111 LYON ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2489UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT FOR METAL AND PLASTIC MANUFACTURING, NAMELY ROLLFORMING MACHINES, DIES, PATTERNS, AND MOLDS | ABANDONED | Sep 2, 1981 |
| 037 | METAL STAMPING SERVICES, PROVIDING METAL PRESSING SERVICES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THIRD PARTIES; AND PRODUCTION MACHINING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MACHINE SHOP SERVICES INCLUDING LATHING, MILLING, AND DRILLING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THIRD PARTIES; AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENT ASSEMBLY SERVICES | ABANDONED | Sep 2, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |