USPTO serial 73831022
HEEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND APPARATUS FOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, ACCESSORIES FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED MACHINES AND APPARATUS, NAMELY ASSEMBLING TO A CIRCUIT BOARD; VACUUM PUMPS; COMPRESSORS, GAS SOLDERING MACHINES, INFRARED-REFLOW-SOLDERING-MACHINES, WAVE-SOLDERING-MACHINES, MACHINES-OPERATED GLUE DISPENSERS AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | MANUALLY OPERATED UTENSILS AND IMPLEMENTS FOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS; NAMELY MANUALLY OPERATED GLUE DISPENSERS AND MANUALLY OPERATED MAGAZINES OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS FOR ASSEMBLING TO A CIRCUIT BOARD AND PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC AND OPTICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS TO BE USED WITH MACHINES AND APPARATUS FOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS; COMPUTERS, KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |