USPTO serial 73831047
KOPENHAGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOPENHAGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD S. TEMKO
RICHARD S TEMKO TEMKO & TEMKO19 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDIES AND CHOCOLATE BARS | ACTIVE | Aug 9, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1990 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |