USPTO serial 73831273
MINIATURE GOLF CLASSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOEGELI, JAMES F.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINIATURE GOLF CLASSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORRIS I. POLLACK
MORRIS I POLLACK19 EBERHARDT RDE HANOVER, NJ 07936UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES PROVIDED AT SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, CORPORATE EVENTS, PRIVATE PARTIES, RESORTS AND THE LIKE INVOLVING RENTING OF PERSONALIZED SET-UP, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IN A COMPETITIVE CONTEST INVOLVING MINIATURE GOLF | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |